- Unalienable- that may not be taken away
- Despotism-absolute power or control; tyranny
- Transient-passing away with time
- Usurpations-acts of wrongfully taking over a right or power that belongs to someone else
- Conjured-appealed to
- Consanguinity-blood relationship
- Acquiesce in the necessity which denounces-recognize that we must demand
- Parallelism-the use of similar grammatical forms to express ideas of equal importance
- Insurrections-an act or instance of rising in revolt, rebellion, or resistance against civil authority or an established government
1. Why do they repeat it?
Because they want to make it personal to one person the King of Britain and not the people so they dont start any war or anything and that way it is more personal.
2. Why do they make it personal?
So they know who did it because it states he and that means the king so if he breaks a law they know that it is him that did it
3. How does the D.I. anticipate its audiences resistance to change?
If they wont to do this or not it is the necessary thing for them to do
4. How does the D.I. use parallelism? How does it impact the effectiveness of the piece?
It shows the importance of each thing by giving examples for each one
parallelism: when a writer uses similar grammatical forms or sentence patterns to express ideas of equal importance.
5.What to you is the most convincing example stated in the D.I.? Why?


No comments:
Post a Comment